TrueGradient vs Netstock: Probabilistic Forecasting Compared
Forecasting can be deterministic or probabilistic. Here’s how AI-native probabilistic planning compares with inventory-driven statistical forecasting for growing brands.
Forecasting Philosophy Shapes Risk Management
Forecasting systems generally fall into two categories: deterministic and probabilistic.
Deterministic systems generate a single expected demand value.
Probabilistic systems generate demand ranges with confidence levels, explicitly modeling uncertainty.
How uncertainty is represented determines how risk is managed.
Netstock: Deterministic Forecasting for Replenishment
Netstock’s forecasting primarily supports inventory optimization workflows.
Statistical methods produce an expected demand value used to calculate reorder points and safety stock.
Uncertainty is typically addressed by adjusting service levels and safety stock buffers.
This deterministic framework works effectively when demand patterns are relatively stable.
TrueGradient: Probabilistic AI-Native Forecasting
TrueGradient embeds probabilistic forecasting within its AI-native planning architecture.
Instead of generating only a single expected demand figure, the system produces confidence bands that represent potential upside and downside outcomes.
This structure allows planners and executives to see how inventory exposure shifts under varying demand conditions.
Safety Stock vs Explicit Uncertainty Modeling
In deterministic systems, safety stock acts as a buffer against forecast error.
In probabilistic systems, uncertainty is directly modeled and visualized.
Rather than increasing buffer inventory reactively, planners can evaluate demand risk scenarios before committing capital.
Volatility and Promotional Sensitivity
Promotions, seasonality shifts, and channel expansion introduce demand variability.
Deterministic models may struggle when historical averages no longer reflect future behavior.
Probabilistic models recalibrate confidence bands as volatility increases, reflecting broader risk exposure.
Capital Implications
Inventory commitments based on single-point forecasts can expose brands to downside demand risk.
Probabilistic forecasting allows leadership to evaluate worst-case scenarios and adjust purchase timing accordingly.
This linkage between forecasting and capital discipline represents a broader integrated planning philosophy.
Organizational Maturity Considerations
Brands with relatively stable demand environments may find deterministic forecasting sufficient.
Brands operating under rapid growth and volatility may benefit from probabilistic intelligence.
The decision often reflects risk tolerance and growth intensity.
Uncertainty Can Be Buffered or Modeled
Netstock manages demand uncertainty primarily through safety stock buffers tied to statistical forecasts.
TrueGradient models uncertainty explicitly through probabilistic AI-native forecasting.
The appropriate approach depends on whether your organization prefers to buffer risk — or to quantify it before making capital commitments.
In volatile markets, visibility into uncertainty can be more powerful than protection against it.
Adopt probabilistic forecasting designed for volatility-aware growth.
Request a demo